Personal tools
You are here: Home Sermons Following Jesus to Samaria
Categories
Archive  February 17, 2010
Blogs  August 21, 2007
Book Reviews  August 21, 2007
Categories  August 17, 2007
Columnists  January 23, 2008
Editorials  August 21, 2007
ELCA Sexuality Statement  August 21, 2007
Extras  August 21, 2007
Hymns  August 15, 2007
Sermons  August 21, 2007
Prayers


Year A  October 18, 2011
Year B  October 18, 2011
Year C  October 18, 2011
 
Document Actions

Following Jesus to Samaria

by Erma Wolf — August 30, 2010

Delivered on August 26, 2010 at the "New Directions for Lutheranism" Conference (TEXT: JOHN 4:27-42)

Delivered on August 26, 2010 at the "New Directions for Lutheranism" Conference (TEXT: JOHN 4:27-42)

The opening verse of this text from the 4th chapter of St. John of course plunks us down abruptly into the middle of one of the best-known stories out of that Gospel.   But let me put this story in context.  Right after the prologue (in chapter one) Jesus is hailed as the Lamb of God by John the Baptist, and promptly takes on several of John’s disciples as his own. In chapter two Jesus performs the first of his signs at Cana in Galilee, the turning of water into wine at a wedding.  Then, as the Passover is coming  he travels to Jerusalem with his disciples,  drives the moneychangers and the sellers of sacrificial animals out of the Temple, has a secret middle of the night conversation  with a leading Pharisee, spends some time with his disciples baptizing in the Judean countryside, and then decides to return to Galilee by way of Samaria.  Reaching the outskirts of the Samaritan city of Sychar, Jesus decides to rest a spell next to the well of Jacob, while the disciples go into town to buy food.  And then, well, we know the story:  “Jesus met a woman at the well, and he told her everything she’d ever done.”

But where we pick up the story is after the long incongruous conversation Jesus and the woman have beside the well, and just after Jesus’ declaration to the woman’s statement of faith that the Messiah is coming,  “I am, the one who is speaking to you.”  Suddenly, the disciples reappear, carrying the 1st century equivalent of a bag of groceries and a take-out lunch.  And we have a few minutes of awk-ward:  the disciples don’t know what  to make of the sight of Jesus sitting next to this woman, this Samaritan woman, with whom he is clearly having an intense conversation.  They are shocked into silence, while the woman appears to realize how truly weird this scene is, because she abruptly gets up and leaves, forgetting all about her water jar.  And as the disciples then try to create a normal atmosphere:  “Rabbi, eat!  Just eat something, ok?” Jesus brushes them off by saying he has food they don’t even know about.  (Which really sends the disciples around the bend;  you just know they’re thinking, he ate with that woman,  and they are even more horrified.)

And then it comes, Verse 34:  “Jesus said to them,  “My food is to do the will of him who sent me and to complete his work.  Do you not say, ‘Four months more, then comes the harvest’?  But I tell you, look around you, and see  how the fields are ripe for harvesting.” 

I thought I knew what this story was about.  I’ve been studying it for longer than I care to admit! I well know that one never completely knows all that there is to know in the Scripture, never can completely understand all that there is to understand, that there are always new insights to be gained, but still, I thought, I know this story.

But I wasn’t prepared for what I saw, this time, that I had never seen before.  I saw the disciples, sitting there with Jesus, looking around at each other, and at their setting.  I saw the crowds streaming out of the city, headed pell-mell to Jacob’s  well, to see for themselves who was there.  I saw the fields, just like the hymn says, white and the harvest waiting.  I looked, and I saw:  Samaria.

Not Judea.  Not Jerusalem.  Not even Galilee.  Samaria.  And the crowds?  Samaritans.  “Look around you, and see:  how the fields are ripe.”  And the first fruits, the first major group in the Gospel of St. John to be gathered in, are all Samaritans. 

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only-begotten Son,  that whosoever believeth in him might not perish, but have everlasting life.”  Whosoever.  And the proof of that comes in Samaria.  God has no standards at all.  He’ll save anybody--anybody that believes in his only begotten Son.   And those who don’t believe?  Well, the only thing I know for sure is that one’s pedigree, no matter how long or how good or how impeccable, won’t make up for not accepting that this one, the Son, is the Anointed One,  sent from the Father,  and believing on him.

Nicodemus, a teacher of Israel, doesn’t see, doesn’t get it.  Those who work every day in the courtyards surrounding the Temple don’t see, don’t get it.  Even the disciples have a hard time getting it.  But a many-times-married Samaritan woman gets it.  A crowd hearing her hesitant, hardly daring to hope witness gets it.  They come out to see for themselves, then beg Jesus to stay and teach them, and he does!  For two days!  And at the end, they make the boldest profession of faith:  “We have heard for ourselves, and we know that this truly is the Savior of the world.” 

Jesus should have condemned the woman for her sins.  Jesus should have condemned the Samaritans for their sins.  And certainly he speaks plainly and bluntly about their sinful condition, whether it is as Samaritans who have rejected the worship of God as the law and the prophets commanded it, or as a woman whose marital situation is, to put the best construction on it, inventive.  But as Jesus said to Nicodemus,  God didn’t send his Son to condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through him. 

But who expected God to start with Samaritans?   

It doesn’t even say that they repent and begin to worship in Jerusalem!  Just that they recognize, and believe.  They see.  And in the Gospel of John, seeing Jesus as he really is, is a key to believing, and to receiving this salvation from the Father.

But the most threatening part of this story?  This isn’t just a story about the past.  Jesus is still going to Samaria.  God may love the world, and call us to make disciples of all nations, but he’s going to make our first assignment Samaria. 

And just where is that? And who are our Samaritans? 

Well, we know who they are.  They’re those who are so like us, it is like looking in a mirror with just a little distortion. It makes us uncomfortable.  Because they’re wrong.  We know they’re wrong.  And they shouldn’t be wrong, because they’re so much like us, they should know better, like we do.  They have no excuse for being wrong. 

And we know that they won’t change.  They’re wrong, and stubborn, and determined not only to be wrong, but to teach others to be wrong as well.  So now we can’t teach together.  We can’t worship together.  More and more, we don’t eat together.   We’ve abandoned any kind of dialogue with them; it’s no use!  We talk at each other, and about each other, not to or with each other.  We have given up on them, and they have given up on us.   In fact, we are all better off if we just stay apart, separated from each other.  Don’t even try to do anything with each other.  Because, well, because they’re Samaritans, and we aren’t.  Enough said. 

Except, what if while we are following Jesus, what if we find him talking with a notorious, public sinner of a Samaritan?   What if, before we go off making disciples of the world, we have to go through Samaria first?

Like all good stories out of the Bible,  this one leaves me with more questions than answers, with an uneasy feeling about what Jesus may be up to.   He must be about fulfilling the work of the Father who sent him, but that looks like it means going to places and people that I don’t want to go to anymore.  What if Jesus goes to people who don’t follow the rules, and they respond in faith?  What if Jesus goes to the country of fundamentalist-Biblical literalists, or justice-seeking political activists, or even liberal mainline Protestants ? What if Jesus goes to the country of bisexual, transgendered, queer, questioning, publicly accountable life-long monogamous same-gendered-relationship gay and lesbian concerned reconciling Lutheran pastors?  Will I follow him, even into that country?  Will you? 

Where is Jesus going today?  What well is he even now sitting down at, and what conversation will he strike up with whoever comes along, someone who is as shocked as we are that Jesus would talk with them?  Will we look around and see, or will we avert our eyes, and plug our ears, and insist that such a thing can’t be happening?  This Jesus, a scandal and stumbling block to all who insist that their blindness is sight, is a door, a shepherd,  a bread of life, a well of living water, a light of grace and truth to all whose eyes have been opened by him.  Will he raise us up, stubborn stones that we are, to be living sons and daughters of God, grafted in to Abraham’s family along with all the Samaritans who seem so bent on following their own way, with their own spirit, over on their own mountain ?

Make no mistake, this Lord insists on being the Savior of the World.  Even of Samaria.  Even, at the greatest cost, of Jerusalem.  Even of ---.

At the end of the Bread of Life controversy in chapter 6, John writes:  “Because of this many of Jesus’ disciples turned back, and no longer went about with him.  So Jesus asked, ‘Do you also wish to go away?’  It is Peter who speaks for the 12, and by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit speaks for all of us, faulty and frail followers, the words of faith that cling  to the only true salvation to be found:  ‘Lord, to whom shall we go?  You have the words of eternal life.  We have come to believe and know that you are the Holy One of God.’”   Look, and see.  The harvest is waiting, and in Samaria.

In the name of the Father, and of the + Son, and of the Holy Spirit.  Amen.

Erma Wolf is an ELCA pastor currently on leave from call. She recently completed a term as Vice-chair of the Lutheran CORE steering committee. This sermon was preached at the Lutheran CORE Theological Conference in Columbus, Ohio. Pr. Wolf lives with her family in South Dakota. 

Sermon response

Posted by Pastor Ted Conter at August 30, 2010 22:46
Pastor Wolf - an excellent message and use of the text. Will make copies to share with others. I am retired after 40 years, so am not on the firing line as you are. Thanks for your ministry.

who is "wrong" and who is "right"

Posted by Randy at August 31, 2010 07:46
Wow--read a certain way (wrong Im sure)this sermon could be a justification for folks remaining in the ELCA........as we know the NALC will NOT venture into such hotbeds of sin and destruction as "Christian" gay communities, (those who look and sound similar to us, except for the fact they are "wrong" and we are "right") unless it is to "correct" and or condemn them. But I am interested in the fact you speak as if YOU and those like you (CORE folks), are the ones who represent Jesus, and those who are wrong, those you KNOW are "wrong", are folks like the ELCA(those allowing gay folks to be pastors, etc)? To my way of thinking, the NALC is just as much "them", just as much "wrong", as anyone else. We have ALL got it wrong. Someway, somehow, we have and will ALL fail to get it right...isnt that what Jesus is all about? If the ELCA has got it "wrong" about gays, are you presuming that the NALC, or ANY other expression of faith, can claim it has got it "right enough" to pass the Law's test of obedience to God? In the end, dont we ALL fall short of the glory of God, in our interpretation and living out the faith, in some way, and therefore all stand as beggers before a gracious God who forgives us, dispite our failures? I always find it sad how eager some Christians are to tell other Christians that THEY are "wrong", never realized or admitting that in some way, each of us has got it "wrong".....and that it is only through our faith in Jesus, flawed and imperfect as that faith might be, that we can hope for salvation. Somewhere, in its collective walk of faith, the NALC has or will get it WRONG, just as it now claims the ELCA has got it so terribly WRONG about gays. Lets pray that Jesus will be more forgiving of the NALC in that moment of error, than the NALC seems to be of the ELCA. The measuring stick you use to decide the faithfulness of another Christian might one day be used on you. My rule of thumb has always been, "when dealing with human beings, always err on the side of GRACE; better to be accused of opening the door of salvation too wide, and allowing a heathen sinner to enter the Kingdom (dont we trust God to take care of that problem?)than to close the door on a soul Jesus has invited (even though we were so sure they were "wrong", and not worthy) into the banquet hall." My blessings to the NALC and CORE. I will regard you as fellow Christians, and look forward to dining with you in the Kingdom of God, even if you decided I was too "wrong" for you to sit at table with me in this world.

Leaving?

Posted by David Charlton at August 31, 2010 10:44
What makes you think that Pastor Wolf is leaving the ELCA for the NALC?

Don't Be So Sure What I Will Do

Posted by Mick Lee at August 31, 2010 13:25
The problem I have with Randy and the many, many other "Randy's" out there is that they are so at ease in accusing the "dissenters" of holding attitudes and proclivities that are clearly inferior to their own superior sensibilities. Where is it written that members of NALC and such will not go into the gay bars and strongholds to share Jesus? Where is the training film that shows a Pastor not to sit down with a bisexual man or woman over a cup of coffee? What usher's manual tells how to throw a transgendered individual out the parish door?" What gold lettered certificate tells us that the ELCA is naturally any better at any of this than any other type of Lutheran?

And just what is the holier-than-thou cr*p about "you don't (sniff...sniff) think I'm good enough to sit at the same table as you"? The truth is there will always be a great deal of fluidity between NALC and the ELCA in terms of member relations if not in formal organizational structures. Such is the case between the LCMS and the ELCA members now--certainly far more than the leadership of each choose to acknowledge. On the other side of our more colorful rhetoric, none of us will regard those in the ELCA as dead to us. There will never be a sign at the doorway which says "ELCA Lutherans need not enter".

But sitting at an NALC table is the least of our ELCA critics concerns. They have provided the provocation and now choose to point the accusing finger. How interesting that those who decry the eagerness of the “dissenters” to “to tell the ELCA that THEY are wrong” in turn themselves clearly indict the dissenters of being made of smaller spiritual stuff. They declare their own willingness to err of the side of too much grace while demonstrating no apprehensions of cheap grace and absolution.

Since its inception, the ELCA leadership and their allied hosts have sought to push the envelope on a myriad of subjects. A serious review of the literature will tell you what those items are. The underlying, festering contention beneath the "homosexuals in the ministry" question and all the others is just how will the Scriptures be read and used. While many of the arguments from Scripture appear to have an "ad hoc" and "inventive" quality to them, the gnawing apprehension is that all these set a precedent for deliberating issues in the future. Make no mistake. It will not end here. Even I, a pigmy spirited dissenter, can see that as far as being taken seriously in any future discussions the deck is stacked against “orthodoxy”.

The "homosexual question", as charged as it was, was simply the breaking point. The ELCA leadership has several times taken the gamble assuming that the membership will come around--if not now then later. So it has been this time. They still think that the membership--even the dissenters--will tolerate practicing homosexual pastors and gay marriages and eventually will approve. Should the ELCA have stopped and cashed in its chips or did it throw the dice one too many times?

Perhaps the true measure of that is not the NALC but those who slip out of the pews and never come back again. Who can deny that the loss of membership began long before the CWA? Maybe the NALC should less as a breakaway Church and more as the last safety net for the disaffected to keep them in the Lutheran fold.

Speaking for myself, I have not left the ELCA. It left me. Much of its public speech and dialogue with its own membership has become unintelligible to me. Much as Luther said to Zwingli, I sadly conclude to the ELCA, "You and I are not of the same spirit". I simply don't understand the ELCA anymore. Instead of speaking to the plain sense of reason or enlightening the Scriptures, the ELCA speaks in magic. When it addresses me, I get a clear sense that it wishes I were someone else. Thus I am alienated from the very Church which claims to put so much stock in diversity. I, one whom the ELCA describes as "not necessarily having to agree to belong", increasingly feel less and less "welcome" at synod gatherings and meetings.

As the song says: “Your words are hot but your lips are cold.” And here we come to an important truth about those dissenters who choose to leave. It is not that the ELCA is merely “wrong” or “mistaken” and that is why they turn away. It is that the ELCA can no longer be counted on to speak the truth. There’s a difference.

Re: Randy

Posted by Adam Ansteve at August 31, 2010 22:30
Um...I think it's gross that you would use such a suggestive login name as "Randy". If you're so *randy* then surely you're only thinking about one thing, and you're not going to find it on this website. Pervert.

Who is Wrong Who is Right

Posted by Erma Wolf at September 01, 2010 01:00
Randy, there is no reason for you to know this, but I am staying in the ELCA. And far from seeing myself (or the Lutheran CORE or NALC adherants) as representing Jesus, I see myself as one of the disciples: clueless much of the time, sometimes too quick to judge but reluctant to ask questions or raise objections that might clear things up, but loving Jesus and, hopefully, staying with him because every other road looks like death and despair. One of my reasons for staying with the ELCA is because I don't know what Jesus is doing with the ELCA, and the divided mess we have right now. I think there is a word of judgment, but it is a judgement that falls on me as much as it falls on others whose faults and sins I lament. I want to stay and find out, even if it means running the risk of being thoroughly upset with my Savior over whom he chooses to sit with. I may have to spend the rest of my life trying to understand what is the proper response to make to others who I fear are very wrong in some very basic beliefs, but whom I know believe that Jesus is the savior of the world.

One other thing: I am a Samaritan to someone. I insist on worshipping on my own mountain, with what I claim and believe is the "right" spirit. As deep as the divide is right now between those on different sides of the sexuality issues, it certainly is not the first or only thing that divides us in the Church. I have relatives who doubt my being a Christian because I reject believer's baptism; as well as friends who would never receive the Eucharist from me because I am an ordained woman pastor. Seeing what Jesus is doing in Samaria is larger and more threatening than just what God might be doing with those in the ELCA" we are in Samaria ANYTIME we assume that certain persons or groups can't possibly be genuinely "in Christ." Samaria is a place of judgement for me then, but in that Jesus might open my eyes to see him as the true Savior sent by the Father for the sake of the world, it is also a place of grace and life.

Who is wrong Who is right sermon and respose

Posted by Margaret at September 01, 2010 07:49
Powerful sermon, made the text come alive. Such basic truths reach out over time and still affect us so deeply.

Peter

Posted by it does apply to us at September 02, 2010 22:23
Randy,

That's the power of this sermon. It *does* apply to those of us celebrating the CWA09 decisions just as much as it applies to those less-thrilled and outright hostile to those decisions, though we need to make the substitutions you point out. For us, NALC = Samaria. It's also an invitation to look for Christ specifically in those Samaritans. I doubt you'll find Him there if you go looking with anger and accusations. At the very least, it is not 'erring on the side of GRACE'

Great Sermon

Posted by Tim Fisher at August 31, 2010 15:32
Preach it, sister!

the Good Samaritan?

Posted by Peter at September 02, 2010 22:29
Pr Wolf,

With this understanding of Samaria, does it also give new meaning to the parable of the Good Samaritan? I ask especially in light of Luther's view that the 'Good Samartian' is Christ, and we are the victim.

The only other question I have about this powerful sermon is what role does Christ's crucifixion and resurrection play in our reluctance to go to Samaria?

the Good Samaritan?

Posted by Pastor Erma Wolf at September 08, 2010 01:53
Peter,

The parable of the Good Samaritan is, of course, in the Gospel of Luke, not in John. However, I noticed something in preaching through Luke this summer that I had not previously seen, regarding the treatment of Samaritans. Prior to the telling of that parable, Jesus and his disciples are traveling through Samaria on their way to Jerusalem (Luke's "Travel Narrative"). This is where Jesus and his disciples are turned away by the inhabitants of a Samaritan village, and James and John ask if fire from heaven should be called down on the village. Jesus instead rebukes James and John for even suggesting this! After that comes Jesus teaching on what his followers are to do when they come to a village: they are to proclaim peace to those there, and if those in that village reject them (as happened with the Samaritan village rejecting Jesus), then one is to just leave, wiping off the dust from one's feet, but nevertheless proclaiming "Know that the Kingdom of God has come near to you." Then comes the parable of the Good Samaritan, where a Samaritan is the hero (and as you point out, Luther views the Good Samaritan as Christ coming to rescue us), as well as the story of Jesus healing the ten lepers, and the one who returns to thank Jesus is identified as a Samaritan. Luke does not have a whole Samaritan village believing in Jesus during his Gospel; however, in Acts one of the signs of the new age is that Samaritans DO believe and the Holy Spirit falls upon them and they are baptized. In the list in Acts of where the Gospel must be preached, Samaria is listed right after Jerusalem and Judea. So it does seem that the Samaritans believing that Jesus is the Christ, and accepting the Gospel, is prepared for by Luke and then fulfilled in Acts.

As to your second question, I think that Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection occur in spite of us, not because we embrace that mission. We avoid going to Samaria for similar reasons that we, like Peter, want Jesus to avoid going to Jerusalem. Something has to die for new life to come forth. In Samaria, that something might be our own ideas of how God's grace and justice works, what our sense of right and wrong is, and who gets invited/included in the Kingdom of God. Of course, what died is Jesus, who also rose again and declares that we will also live through him; but I think we must admit that we also must die, die literally but also die figuratively to our pet ideas of what the saved are like and what Jesus demands of those saved by him. Such death is risky, painful, and threatening to what we cherish; but without that death there will be no life. Jesus dies for the Samaritans who continue to worship apart, on their own mountain, in contradiction to what God asks from his people in worship; he dies for the People of God who have teh right interpretation and follow the right practices, but not because they live like that but because he is the Savior of the World; and he dies for those who reject him, even to the point of killing him. If we don't go to Samaria, we will not encounter the risen Lord, who calls all to be saved. But if we go to Samaria, we will see the risen Lord declaring that all of his sheep, even the Samaritan sheep, will be one flock, under one Shepherd. As long as we refuse to go to Samaria, we reject that the cross is salvation for all peoples and races and tongues, and ultimately reject it as saving for ourselves.

Samaritans

Posted by Pr. Ernest M. Waxbom, Jr. (long retired) at October 15, 2010 10:27
Pr. Erma knows the Gospel! What a challenge she sets forth. I am thoroughly ticked off by what our ELCA has done! But at age 79 I'm staying--and doing what I can to proclaim "The faith once delivered to the saints." [My Synod (S.W. Pa) sends me out every Sunday to preach the Word and celebrate the Sacraments.] I doubt that we can reform the ELCA in the short term--but I know that God has a longer term of reference. And I also know that we need another Lutheran denomination like we need another proverbial "hole in the head." I also ask, "Am I a Samaritan? Am I?"

Now in Print

Winter 2011


Winter 2011 Cover

In this issue:

Finding the Missio in Promissio

Law and Gospel
(with Some Help from St. John)

From Mission Church
to Missionary Church in
Malaysia and Singapore

St. Dag Hammarskjold

The Cost of Commenting
on the Emperor's Attire

Practicing a Theopaschite
Christology with St. Cyril
of Alexandria

American Lutheranism's
First Dispute

...and much, much more!

Subscribe online!

Submissions
We always welcome thoughtful articles, letters to the editor, hymns, and artwork.

Submission guidelines
 

Powered by Plone CMS, the Open Source Content Management System

This site conforms to the following standards: