Personal tools
You are here: Home Blogs Occult America
Categories
Archive  February 17, 2010
Blogs  August 21, 2007
Book Reviews  August 21, 2007
Categories  August 17, 2007
Columnists  January 23, 2008
Editorials  August 21, 2007
ELCA Sexuality Statement  August 21, 2007
Extras  August 21, 2007
Hymns  August 15, 2007
Sermons  August 21, 2007
Prayers


Year A  October 18, 2011
Year B  October 18, 2011
Year C  October 18, 2011
 
Document Actions

Occult America

by Paul Sauer February 16, 2010

Three is a tendency for individuals to assume that the days in which they are living are the apex of spiritual decline. That with the preponderance of new religions and religious philosophies and the decline of the old mainline Christian faiths, a new religious order will be established and Christians will be pre-Constantinian outcasts once more. History tends to generalize and sanitize and as a result the past often becomes homogeneous and the glory days become perhaps a little more glorious than they may have in actual fact been... Mitch Horowitz’s Occult America: The Secret History of How Mysticism Shaped Our Nation provides a helpful corrective to the view that America was once a unified Christian (at least in the traditional creedal sense of the word) nation.

Three is a tendency for individuals to assume that the days in which they are living are the apex of spiritual decline. That with the preponderance of new religions and religious philosophies and the decline of the old mainline Christian faiths, a new religious order will be established and Christians will be pre-Constantinian outcasts once more. History tends to generalize and sanitize and as a result the past often becomes homogeneous and the glory days become perhaps a little more glorious than they may have in actual fact been.

Mitch Horowitz’s Occult America: The Secret History of How Mysticism Shaped Our Nation (Bantam Books 2009 isbn:978-0-553-80675-5) provides a helpful corrective to the view that America was once a unified Christian (at least in the traditional creedal sense of the word) nation. In a book that is deeply sympathetic to the Occult*, Horowitz paints a picture of 1800 and 1900s America where as many as 1.5 to 3 million of the 30 Million Americans in the 1850s considered themselves occultist.

Beyond the numbers, what is perhaps most striking is the role that the Occult had not only in the founding of still-surviving new American religions like Mormonism, Seventh Day Adventism, Christian Science, and the Shakers but how many prominent individuals were influence by Spiritualist ideas even if they did not embrace the movement outright. Political leaders like Abraham Lincoln, Ronald Reagan and George Wallace, societal revolutionaries like Frederick Douglass and Marcus Garvey and even so-called mainstream Christian writers like Norman Vincent Peale all were profoundly influenced by the Occult in one of its various forms.

What is equally amazing are the number of now long-forgotten Occult leaders who, despite the millions of books and products sold and relative fame in their own lifetimes, have faded beyond the warrant of even a historical footnote in the history of Religion in America.

Horowitz not only provides a well-documented history of a forgotten segment of American society, he provides a striking reminder to the church today that the rise of new (oftentimes repackaged old) religious thought is nothing new. The church has faced them in the past and the gates of hell have not prevailed against it. Where the Occult arose to meet a need often neglected by mainline Christian religion like racial inequality, gender inequality, poverty, or a lack of interfaith and ecumenical engagement, the church rose to the occasion and self-corrected.

The haunting question, however, that Horowitz raises has he closes Occult America is how much Occultism has seeped into the mainstream of American religious thought through these self-corrections:

Most people, thought schools, or movements identified as New Age from the 1970s [the modern inheritors of the early Occultists] through the early twenty-first century shared these traits: 

1. “Belief in the therapeutic value of spiritual or religious ideas

2. “Belief in a mind-body connection in health

3. “Belief that human consciousness is evolving to higher stages

4. “Belief that thoughts, in some greater or lesser measure, determine reality

5. “Belief that spiritual understanding is available without allegiance to a specific religion or doctrine.”

Most twenty-first century Americans, whatever their background, would probably agree with a majority of those statements. To a very great degree, occult movements and personalities had introduced those ideas, in some of their most popular variants, into American life. . . The encounter between America and occultism resulted in a vast reworking of arcane practices and beliefs from the Old World and the creation of a new spiritual culture. This new culture extolled religious egalitarianism and responded, perhaps more than any other movement in history, to the inner needs and search of the individual. (257-8)

 

*The term "Occult" is used throughout to subsume the broad range of religious philosophies including Swedenborgianism, Transcendentalism, Spiritualism, Theosophy, Rosicrucianism, Numerology, Voodoo, Hoodoo, Astrology, New Age, New Thought, Mesmerism, and Religious Science.

Man-made

Posted by Kurt at February 16, 2010 19:27
Do we need further proof that religion, if not theology itself, is a man-made phenomenon?

I'll bite

Posted by Peter at February 16, 2010 19:55
What are you actually trying to say here? That people are the ones who organize religion and talk theology? That seems pretty self-evident to me. Or are you obliquely trying to say that the Spirit does not act through people and that Jesus was not divine? Or are you suggesting that universal experience of the divine is neither proof of God's omnipresence nor fulfillment of Jeremiah's prophecy ("For they shall all know Me"), but rather evidence that there is no such thing as the divine? Or that since everyone can experience the divine, there is no need for anyone to save us from that same divine?

Not so secret

Posted by Lawrence Rast at February 17, 2010 11:46
I'm always a little leery of books that have "secret" in the title--especially if they deal with the occult! However, two other helpful books that also address the subject of the extent of "occult" belief in the U.S. are:

1. Jon Butler, Awash in a Sea of Faith: Christianizing the America People (Cambridge: Harvard, 1990 ).

2. Philip Jenkins, Decade of Nightmares: The End of the Sixties and the Making of Eighties America (New York: Oxford, 2006).

I highly recommend them both.

Religion

Posted by Brad Evans at March 11, 2010 20:14
People need religion like they need accupuncture needles in their eyeballs.
Of course religion is man-made. And badly made at that.

Who needs religion?

Posted by Stuart Smith at March 11, 2010 22:52
So-called "atheists" who feel an obsession to remind themselves that they are "free from religion".

Religion

Posted by Liisa B. Wilson at March 21, 2010 07:32
Brad,

Who are you, and what are you doing on this blog?

The apparent atheist--Brad

Posted by Mark J. Mathews at April 07, 2010 22:58
Liisa? Are you really objecting to an atheist in this blog? Is this for Christians only? Don't question his motives, just be happy he stopped by!

Now in Print

Winter 2011


Winter 2011 Cover

In this issue:

Finding the Missio in Promissio

Law and Gospel
(with Some Help from St. John)

From Mission Church
to Missionary Church in
Malaysia and Singapore

St. Dag Hammarskjold

The Cost of Commenting
on the Emperor's Attire

Practicing a Theopaschite
Christology with St. Cyril
of Alexandria

American Lutheranism's
First Dispute

...and much, much more!

Subscribe online!

Submissions
We always welcome thoughtful articles, letters to the editor, hymns, and artwork.

Submission guidelines
 

Powered by Plone CMS, the Open Source Content Management System

This site conforms to the following standards: