A Rebirth for Orphanages?
For many in my generation the word orphanage conjures up images formed by movies where abuse and neglect are the norm rather than the exception. The word “institutionalization” in the adoption world is usually followed by a discussion of how to deal with physical and emotional challenges that are raised as a result of a child’s institutionalization. Life in an orphanage has been bad for children since the days of Dickens’s Oliver Twist, or so the conventional wisdom says...
For many in my generation the word orphanage conjures up images formed by movies where abuse and neglect are the norm rather than the exception. The word “institutionalization” in the adoption world is usually followed by a discussion of how to deal with physical and emotional challenges that are raised as a result of a child’s institutionalization. Life in an orphanage has been bad for children since the days of Dickens’s Oliver Twist, or so the conventional wisdom says. As a result, most “modern” countries have moved away from the institutionalization of orphans, and into some sort of temporary foster care system to try and meet their needs. A new study by Duke University[1], although focusing on foreign orphanages, challenges many of the assumptions that have been made about the health of children in orphanages versus those in foster care, and which have driven so much of American social policy regarding orphan children.
American author and producer, and former orphanage resident, Richard B McKenzie, summarizes his own findings of former residents of American orphanages:
During the past decade I have surveyed more than 2,500 alumni from 15 American orphanages. In two journal articles, I reported the same general conclusion: The orphanage alumni have outpaced their counterparts in the general population often by wide margins in almost all social and economic measures, including educational attainment, income and positive attitude toward life. White orphanage alumni had a 39% higher rate of college graduation than white Americans of the same age, and less than 3% had hostile memories of their orphanage experiences. University of Alabama historian David Beito replicated the study with several hundred alumni from another orphanage, reaching much the same conclusions.[2]
The key, it seems, is the stability (one might even say “family”) that an orphanage provides in a way that the impermanency of “foster care” does not. McKenzie writes of his own orphanage experience:
The children at Barium Springs Home for Children worked a lot and didn't get the hugs many children take for granted, but we did get advantages that many children today don't get—a sense of security, permanence and home.[3]
At one time, orphanages were central to the Human Care ministries of the Lutheran Church. While a changing social environment shifted the focus of our care of orphans[4] from orphanages to foster care and adoption, continued changes to our understanding about how best to meet the needs of orphan children and children in distress ought to inspire us to seek out new ways to address those needs, even if it means looking to an old model, like orphanages, to supplement the care provided by foster care and adoption.
[1] http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0008169
[2]http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703510304574626080835477074.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
[3]http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703510304574626080835477074.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
[4] Here in New York, the Wartburg Orphan’s Farm School (Lutheran) became the Wartburg Adult Care Community which now cares for senior citizens. http://www.thewartburg.org/history.html For a full history of the Wartburg including its transformation see "Nurturing Mind, Body and Spirit: The Story of the Wartburg Care Community" in The Westchester Historian Volume 85, No. 4 (Fall 2009) p. 136-155. Information available at www.westchesterhistory.com.
Are Orphanages Staging A Comeback
I am an orphanage alumnus (1953-1962) and according to the article, I surpass the national averages at many levels. I hold the MBA from Rutgers University, made well over the national average in salary when I worked on Wall Street, and hold a generally positive outlook on life.
But that doesn't mean I didn't experience terror at the orphanage I lived in. My point is that pleasant memories (field trips to Yankee Stadium) can exist side by side with wretched memories (beatings by bullies, late night stair cleaning drills, midnight rousings to resolve a theft). On balance, I met people who made it their business to insure that we were given the same childhood experiences as children anywhere.
Dr. McKenzie cites the happiness surrounding orphanage reunions - and there is no doubt about this but we should ask what exactly it is the returning orphans are celebrating. I'd celebrate too if I could be reunited with those that endured the orphanage expereince with me. Billy Dennis, John Dennis, Ritchie Waluda, Tommy Linda, Bernard Loftin, all names of kids who went through the hard times with me - what a joy to see them again. But if you told us we would once again be living in an orphanage environment, my feeling is the parking lot would empty rather quickly. In other words, reunions succeed because of the bonds between the re-united.
And take a look at some of the orphanage bulletin boards. It's not hard to come across discriptions like: "that hellhole" or "the nuns beat us silly" which more than outweigh phrases attesting to loving kindness. On one billboard, I saw a lending institution post a note for money available to the orphans at "reasonable rates" and the advertiser was derided and implored to stop advertising on the site because, as the critic put it "We are suffering souls here". That gives a sense of the quality of experience such people underwent.
Finally, I find Dr. McKenzie's contention that we need a "Sam Walton of child care" completely bizarre. It strikes me as a call for warehousing of children like we warehouse peanut butter, or eggs, or frozen fish fillet and it should be rejected out of hand.
Thank you
Robert Taylor Brewer
Mr. Brewer has completed a novel about his orphanage experience: The Boy Who Would Not Play Ball
Abusive Conditions
The Wartburg Orphan Farm School,Mt.Vernon,N.Y.
The Wartburg continued
Abuse at Wartburg
Wartburg In Mt. Vernon, New York
Bob Bachman encouraged excellence in the arts, the sciences, literature, sports, reading the classics, theater, gymnastics, acrobatics, invention, architecture, acting, music, singing and special effects, aerospace, geography, singing, football, soccer, archery, et al.
Bob Bachman produced and directed professional musical theatrical productions that were never before nor after the Bachmans.
There were poor and some well off children at Wartburg. There were European foreign children there, too. There were some children there who mothers were hookers, prostitutes, who never or rarely visited their children. There were typical late 1950's and early 1960's teenagers, too. Few kids had much.
The Wartburg school on campus until it closed in 1961 went from first grade through 6th grade. Each classroom had two grades, 1st and 2nd; 3rd and 4th; and 5th and 6th. This allowed and provided for superior learning because learnt to grades at a time for two years. With the elementary school's closing Wartburg destroyed and educational gem because there the 2B kids who studied beyond the requirements on their own as a group.
Yes, there were problems. There were many fights. But I do not recall any thefts at 2B.
But few children there, except the 2B boys under the Bachman reign, were creative, inventive and hungry for knowledge and excellence.
There was little displayed friendship(s) outside of the Wartburg confines when kids went home for the holidays or the summer. Kids visiting one another homes just did not happen as you might expect. Only intercation at Wartburg with predominant behavior.
The Bachmans were a extraordinary mother and son team that the Wartburg adminsitration never fully appreciated nor praised in public to the press or to donors. Where are they mentioned in Wartburg history?
Wartburg got rid of Mr. Singer, the music teacher and the band leader. It destroyed an excellent music program.
The Bachmans keep 2B kids up-to-date on current events on television news programs and in newspapers. As the kid watched television shows, there were simultaneous discussions of what was seen and their significance.
With Wartburg administrative regime changes, the barbarians, with their stone age ignorance and prejudices, made their presence overwhelmingly intrusive at 2B and with 2B kids, ergo 2B kids' parents.
The Bachmans practiced fairness and justice.
When kids got to the Wartburg elementary school's 5th and 6th grades they were taught anti-Russian Tsarism and anti-communism through comic strip type books.
A Little Misleading
Orphanages did provide a place of permanency and stability for "orphans", that maybe foster care did not. Children in orphanages knew they were going to spend the rest of their lives in an institution. And in twisted way that is comforting to them.
The basic needs are met in orphanages maybe on a much smaller level, but they're met one way or another. It's the stability and grounding of "roots" kids want.
However when children are placed in a nurturing foster home that is stable, and where their needs are met, they are much better off.
It's when children are shuffled around from foster care home to foster care home is where a lot of "damage" of children is done.
I remember hearing stories of studies that show that the shuffling of kids from one foster home to another does more damage than the original abuse the kids were subjected to in the first place.
Overall, a good foster home is much, much better than any orphanage.
That study is little skewed in my opinion.
Corrisa
http:www.InternetNetworkMarketingTraining.com